User talk:122.109.127.168

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm Addihockey10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cypenamine because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 05:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talk page comments
Please, this is enough. If you can't make your point without being rude, better stay quiet. Personal attacks and incivility may be a ground for blocking on Wikipedia. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC) WEll when I say that you are a "little bitch" I don`t mean you are a little female dog (or do I???)--122.109.127.168 (talk) 07:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have temporarily protected User talk:BigPimpinBrah from editing by unregistered users. Please, just drop it. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Saying that somebody's username "makes me sick and you look foolish" is not very civil, and in any case you don't have to repeat it three times. (And for the record, by using the slang term "pimping" the user does not mean that he's a pimp.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

For the second time - with regards to your comments at User talk:Rifleman 82 - if you can't make your point without being rude, please don't make it. And if you can't resist, you will be blocked from editing for personal attacks. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't care how much you are right (or believe to be right); don't insult other users - just calmly explain to what point you believe them to be wrong. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * How about YOU making a coherent case for the statement (referenced to Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals) being "nonsense", as you put it? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I have It can't be any simpler, I started a section in the tale page about it, its chem 101, if you read the sterochem section below it it explains why I am right, to a chemist (which I am)even with a minimal grasp of the subject it is obviously wrong (a incoherant statment). Show me the exact quote I bet you cant (its illogical). That is why I could not believe a "chemist!?" put it back. Its like your asking me to justify why I think it is incorrect to say stop means go or black is white or the earth is the center of the solar system do I NEED TO REINVENT THE WHEEL or something to for you to believe in wheels.--122.109.127.168 (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Cypenamine
Thanks for your message. I see your point of view and I don't think your changes were made in bad faith. As you know, Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. However, some edits (even in good faith) might be found unhelpful to the encyclopedia and therefore they are removed or reverted. In our case, you removed a statement supported by a reference so your changes kept getting reverted. If you think the statement is wrong and you find a counter-statement supported by a reliable source, you can post it here. The policy on sourcing is verifiability, which requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged. Regards — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 08:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ...and to explain why I reverted your edit...we don't put comments in the article (with exceptions such as dubious and not in source and cn). I see you've commented on the talk page of the article and that is the right place. Next time you may want to refer to the talk page in your edit summary so the edit can be better understood, and provide a reference or point out something specific as I'm sure you can appreciate collaborative editing. user:Rifleman 82 has checked the ref, and made the edit now. I don't know or care about the issue at hand, but I do know that comments like you made on my talk page although out of frustration are disruptive. Even if you are right, repeatedly making the same edit without giving others more of a clue can be also seen as disruptive. Widefox ; talk 10:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * This isn't a place for your ego to scribble derisory comments on other editors pages, but being as your edit seems useful, maybe you'd be less frustrated if you listened to others explain why there's more here than just this edit, be constructive, possibly even create an account to make it even easier? Widefox ; talk 10:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:BigPimpinBrah, you may be blocked from editing. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 14:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.