User talk:122.161.50.137

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mahabharat (2013 TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SunDawn talk  13:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:51, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Suryaputra Karn. POLITANVM talk 04:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Suryaputra Karn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rdp060707&#124;talk 05:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gandiva, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 03:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vijaya (bow). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 03:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sharanga, you may be blocked from editing. ''Stop your unsourced and biased editing. You received many warnings. Admins will be looking into this seriously. You will be blocked soon if you continue to edit in this way.'' Fire star on heat (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

This user seems to be biased user. I checked all his/her edits. All edits in various articles showed that he/she is in favour of Mahabharat character Karna. Overglorifiying a character without sources is violation. User's edits also confirm that he/she is against to character Arjun. Articles related to Mahabharat and Mahabharat characters must be checked regularly and this user needs to be blocked permanently. Fire star on heat (talk) 15:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)