User talk:122.162.144.151

August 2022
Hello, I'm RealLifeRobot. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RealLifeRobot (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I've seen the film in question and I chose to edit the quotes about the film in a manner that more accurately reflect the film's primary themes. There was no question of a non neutral edit as the quote I edited out was also positive in nature and I felt that the choice of quotes on wikipedia was givving an inaccurate reflection of the film's themes. I only removed a section of one quote and didn't add anything positive or edit quotes inaccurately. 122.162.144.151 (talk) 07:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I understand your intention and I do not want to judge you personally. Your edits stood out to me since you've admitted in your first reply that you've worked on the film set, which makes this a WP:COI. Editing with a conflict of interest is discouraged per the Wikipedia guidelines. It does not help your case that you've removed only part of the quote, which basically means that it is not a quote anymore at all. A quote is a truthfull representation of someone elses statement, not the part of someone elses statement that you agree with. This means that the quote is inaccurate. RealLifeRobot (talk) 15:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. RealLifeRobot (talk) 05:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)