User talk:122.174.231.20

Recent edits at Rahul Easwar
Hi there, some of your recent edits at Rahul Easwar have been problematic. In this edit your hasty move to remove content about menstruation resulted in a grammatically problematic paragraph, because you removed a vital piece of information that flows directly into other content in the article, including Easwar's rebuttal. In this particular case, the majority of articles I've read on the issue say that women and girls of menstrual age are banned from the temple. That is the majority opinion. This is a significant detail related to the entire controversy. We need that information in order for Easwar's rebuttal to make sense. Short story: Don't remove content if it's going to muck up anything else. That change was sloppy.

Secondly, in this edit you removed information about Easwar's spouse, which was sourced to this article. Why did you remove that content? The article clearly says: "Speaking to Republic, Rahul's wife Deepa Vijayan said..." Your removal of this information is not constructive.

Thirdly, you've added to his education parameter "IIM (A)". That information isn't sourced, and it's also a useless mess of letters. We always define abbreviations the first time we use them. We don't make assumptions that readers in Brazil are going to know that IIM (A) is the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad. Please be more careful in the future.

Lastly, re: this, references go in the body of the article, not in edit summaries. I have fixed this for you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2018 (UTC)