User talk:122.212.155.138

April 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to James Delingpole— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

It wasn't meant to be constructive, it was meant to be factual.


 * Hi, Good day. Your edit is considered unconstructive. Please familiar yourself with  Wikipedia policies and guideline -on neutral point of view . Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:11, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

It's not nonconstructive its a fact. Also, uncontructive is not a correct word. There is no need to familirise myself with any time wasting policies. Familiarise yourself with facts.


 * Thank you for pointing out I missed out an "s" on the the word "unconstructive". I just want to let you know that if you continue the same type of edit as the one above in the future, you might be blocked from Wikipedia. Have a good day.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Oh no, please don't threaten to block me for no reason at all other than trying to look tough on the internet. No 's' was missing, 'unconstructive' isn't a word and you're use of quotation marks was also incorrect.

May 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to SilverPush. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Piss off Jim

June 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at England national football team, you may be blocked from editing. Cynko (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Stirling Moss— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 08:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

It's constructive and its a correct change.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jackie Stewart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Educate yourself Denis rather than fire ridiculous accusations.

Changing Nationalities
Could you please not change nationalities of companies and people without good reason? Generally speaking, most companies that operate in England also operate in the rest of the UK, and are registered with the UK companies house as UK company. Actors etc who have appeared on TV have usually appeared on a UK wide channel. The Government in London is the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. So changing these to "English" is both factually incorrect, and a waste of both your time and the editor who has to revert it. It is also frowned on to change the nationality of British citizens without some rational. Are they specially identified as being English? Have they expressed a preference for being identified as English? Modifying their nationality simply to match your own preferences is not an acceptable reason.

If you simply must change nationality, could you please provide a good reason in your edit summary. It would help others understand your thinking. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. Do you think that I would change them without good reason? Think about before you waste my time and your time by writing such nonsense. You comment about being factual incorrect is a display of ignorance and it is most definitely not frowned upon to change the nationality of 'british' citizens without some rational, UNLESS they are English, and English only. I trust that you are English writing this. Educate yourself rather than embarrass yourself.


 * I've no idea why you might change them, as you don't give others the courtesy of an explanation. I can guess, but you may not care for my conclusions.  However, I see you are still at this.  Please stop your disruptive editing.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 09:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

-1 Your conclusions are moot and based on your opinion only. -2 'Disruptive editing' is your invalid opinion only and cannot be challenged and the editing is considered as valid. Thank you for your time wasting comment.

October 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Red Dwarf. Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

How is this vandalism? It is not. It is mere correction.