User talk:122.53.41.214

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of SM Supermalls. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

New message from Eejit43
~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 12:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

New message from Eejit43
~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 12:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SM City Sorsogon (March 13)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:SM_City_Sorsogon Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.

Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss.

There is a history of sockpuppetry associated with this draft. If this draft is resubmitted, please check the history and determine whether the submitter is quacking. If so, please take appropriate action, which may include filing a follow-up sockpuppet investigation.

This does not mean that the topic is not notable, and it does not mean that the topic is notable. If this draft is resubmitted by a neutral good-faith reviewer, it may be reviewed and accepted based on its content and sources.

See the history of SM City Sorsogon, which has repeatedly been expanded into an article by IP addresses and then repeatedly cut down to a redirect, and is now a locked redirect due to sockpuppetry. This draft is another submission by an IP address. I couldn't accept this draft if I wanted to accept it, but I don't plan to accept a draft by an unregistered editor when there is a history of spamming by unregistered editors.

If a neutral extended-confirmed editor wants to write a draft, we can consider whether to request that the redirect be unlocked. Registered editors may ask questions at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)