User talk:122.8.230.42

June 2018
Hello, I'm The Mighty Glen. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Aamina Sheikh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TMGtalk 15:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 15:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mahira Khan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TMGtalk 15:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Mahira Khan. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TMGtalk 15:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Aamina Sheikh. TMGtalk 15:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Mahira Khan and Aamina Sheikh both are highest paid and considered Superstars. You dont have right as user is remove all awards and filmography of Aamina Sheikh, seems like you have too much interest in these two then other pages.
 * Kindly read WP:BLP. If you have a WP:Reliable source to back up your claims, then use that to WP:Verify the claim. All contentious, unsourced claims must be removed from biographies of living people. That's how it works on Wikipedia. TMGtalk 16:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes i know its all rules are only for these two biographies. Kajol, Kareena Kapoor all are your so called clients i think?

Clients?
Hello 122.8.230.42. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:122.8.230.42. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Ronz (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I am not any one's client but it seems you have so much concerned with Mahira Khan and Aamina Sheikh. Just answer me what is this, this user have no right to do this. And if he is so much interest in removing others work so why dont he visit Kajol and Kareena Kapoor etc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.8.230.42 (talk • contribs) 16:21, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
 * You're free to edit those articles for a more WP:Neutral point of view if you wish. And yes, there are many, many, poorly-sourced articles on Wikipedia. You can help by improving them. TMGtalk 16:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

No i am not free as you are special security guard of this page who is only interested in revert back others edit and removing unsourced stuffs. I think you dont have any work in real life that why spending time on wikipidea just to destroy pages. I am saying this only for "The Mighty Glen". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.8.230.42 (talk • contribs) 16:30, June 17, 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. TMGtalk 16:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I've requested that this ip be blocked for repeated WP:BLP violations and edit warring over those BLP violations. Working with biographical information requires the use of sources (and high-quality sources at that), or the content should be removed. None of the edits from this ip has included a source, nor indicated an existing one. --Ronz (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 16:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Stop your disruptive editing...
...because you're making things worse. --Saqib (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)