User talk:1222tiffany1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! &mdash; RHaworth 13:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Dog dna breed identification


The article Dog dna breed identification has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * veiled spam

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 13:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

I accidently mixed the references with the outside links. I've changed this and it is now correct. This should take care of everything.

November 2009
Your addition to Dog dna breed identification has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. KuyaBriBri Talk 14:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

My mistake..........I was looking at another site to see how they did it. I've made the necessary corrections and it should not be in violation of anything.

Thanks.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12 November 2009 (talk • contribs)

I beleive I've correected everything including the removal of: ==Copyright problems with Dog dna breed identification== Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dog dna breed identification, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Dog dna breed identification appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dog dna breed identification has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 1222tiffany1 (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing everything to my attention........I'm learning as I'm doing this.

Copyright violation
The current version of Dog dna breed identification is a verbatim copy of http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/237-46.pdf, which is a violation of Wikipedia copyright policies. Normally in the case of an article with any history, the course of action would be to revert to an earlier version that did not include the copyright, but the history of this article shows that it was created with the copyright violation, and no useful version exists with any useful information that does not include this copyright violation. Please do not reintroduce the copyrighted material without demonstrating (through the process documented here) that you have the right to post the material on Wikipedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

I removed everything that you brought to my attention. (==Copyright problems with Dog dna breed identification== Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dog dna breed identification, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Dog dna breed identification appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dog dna breed identification has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 1222tiffany1 (talk) 15:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC) ) My mistake as I was looking at another page to determine how to do this.  I believe everything is now corrected.

Thanks

Blocked for 48 hours for repeated copyright violations
for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem...........I'll rewrite the material I originally wrote a few years ago and input the rewritten material into Wilkepedia. There is no conflict as this is technical material I wrote and is not about the company I own but about DNA testing, nutrition and DNA sampling for Canines in general. This is an area that is of interest, technically to many individuals who have dogs for pets, hence the reason for inputting it into Wikipedia.

What's your point?
In reading DNA dog breed identification I am left confused as to what point is trying to be made with the article. It is not clear if you intend to state that DNA analysis can or cannot be used to identify dog breeds. You introduce a fair amount of material indicating why it is difficult at best to use DNA analysis to identify breeds, but then proceed to show why such analysis is beneficial. You also cite 3 references, all of which have nothing to do with the material you have posted. Vis:
 * Reference [1] supports the statement "Using DNA analysis by itself [it] is almost impossible to ascertain with any degree of accuracy the lineage of the Canine." The reference links to an article on the Harvard website announcing that the canine genome has been sequenced.  It says nothing at all about accuracy of breed identification.
 * Reference [2] supports the statement "The composition of DNA code is based on specific combinations of SNPs, Adenine (A), Cytosine (C), Guanine (G), and Thymine (T)." While the reference does support that statement, it is unnecessary, as a link to gene sequencing would have provided the reader with a much better source of information on the topic.
 * Reference [3] supports the statement "This allows the owner or veterinarian to determine what type of nutrition and veterinary pet care may be needed." and links to the site of the Waltham pet food company, which mentions nothing about breed-specific pet nutrition.

I would be inclined to clean up the article, but I don't know how since I don't know what message is being attempted. My first step would be to remove the irrelevant references and tag the article as unreferenced, hoping that someone more knowledgeable might be able to supply meaningful references. Beyond that, I don't know where to go with this. If you can explain what point you are trying to make, I might be able to assist. However, if I can't find any reliable sources to verify any point that you might be trying to make, the article may be destined for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)