User talk:123.103.210.114

August 2020
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Peter Rathjen.   1sub Atomic  (talk)  12:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saudis, you may be blocked from editing.   1sub Atomic  (talk)  12:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Saudis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   ❯❯  1sub Atomic (Talk)  11:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I undid your latest contributions to Saudis because you failed to cite a reliable, neutral source. The news article that you cited only shows the opinion of a politician, not a fact. Please discuss your changes on the article's talk page and see Edit warring. If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page. ❯❯ 1sub Atomic (Talk)  11:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Always cite any addition you made in especially BLP ( F5pillar ---/  'Messager🖋📩 ) 06:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * He is in a coffeehouse.123.103.210.114 (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coffeehouse. Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Physical attractiveness; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Swadge2 (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Not vandalism, you idiot. This is an attractive model.123.103.210.114 (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Then why did you delete Billy Glide! His name is on that list. He's a porno actor.123.103.210.114 (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring
And read my edit summary. It's not about the source; firstly, what you have added is factually incorrect, and secondly, the information you added is arguably irrelevant to the topic of the article (hence my request to discuss it on the talk page of the article). Your lack of edit summary and use of bare urls don't help. Please use the talk page, if you are at all interested in becoming a better editor. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Human rights in Qatar, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of accidents and incidents involving the Airbus A320 family. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

May 2021
Your recent editing history at Ranger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 06:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Please discuss at Talk:Ranger instead of continuing to edit war. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 06:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * But you also seem to be involved in this edit war too, even after I have explained it to you.123.103.210.114 (talk) 06:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that in this edit to Civil Police (San Marino), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Asartea   Talk  undefined  Contribs  10:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Heyy, I did not remove it. I merely transferred it to another section. Please don't accuse me.123.103.210.114 (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nayirah testimony, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nayirah testimony. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Andorra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Saud Nasser Al-Saud Al-Sabah, you may be blocked from editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I said that it is in the source.123.103.210.114 (talk) 10:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. jp×g 02:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Grenadian passport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sri Lankan passport, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Ongoing problems with this editor

 * Yesterday I went through all of this IP's still standing edits, and found that almost every one needed a change, fix, improvement or reversion. Poor formatting and bare urls were the least of the problems. The pattern of editing, attitude and comments closely resembles 129.127.32.138, so I suspect the same editor is responsible, who is apparently unable or unwilling to learn some of the basics of Wikipedia editing even after hundreds of edits. If you carry on like this, you will continue to attract warnings and/or blocks, so I suggest that you either show some willingness to learn from your mistakes, or give up editing. You are wasting the valuable time of editors who are contributing in a worthwhile manner. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Michael Jackson's Thriller (music video) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.  Dewritech (talk)  11:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello. Thanks but you were mistaken. The edit is constructive.123.103.210.114 (talk) 11:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Jackson's Thriller (music video). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Dewritech (talk)  11:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * It is not vandalism. Do not incorrectly label edits as vandalism. This has been discussed in the movie. As I said earlier, the edit is constructive.123.103.210.114 (talk) 12:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Duggar, you may be blocked from editing. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 10:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Michael Jackson's Thriller (music video), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. The content that has been repeatedly removed is not significant to Thriller 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 10:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for 1 year
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 11:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Madison Avenue, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nick Levine (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Recording suicides as properties of the places they happened is indeed trivialising them. Nick Levine (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * On the contrary, you removing information about suicides and deaths is trivialising them.123.103.210.114 (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 34th Street (Manhattan), you may be blocked from editing. Nick Levine (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Nick Levine (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Isn't that what you are doing? You are vandalising.123.103.210.114 (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:NOTVAND and WP:NOTNEWS, and discuss your changes on these articles' talk pages. The information was removed because it is only tangentially related to a certain place. Every suicide and death at a certain location does not need to be recorded just because it happened, and reverting an article to the status quo version is not vandalism. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on USS North Carolina (SSN-777). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -  w o lf  10:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Suggestion
Take your proposed change to one of the article talk pages and see what other editors think Nick Levine (talk) 09:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh thanks for the suggestion.123.103.210.114 (talk) 09:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Ditto
Came here to say the same thing. You made an edit, it wasn't comppletely undone, but some improvments were needed. Keep in mind, this was done so that the article could retain the image you added. Some editors would just remove it, and tbat could still happen. Anyway, per wp:brd and onus, if you wish to challenge the changes I made to your edit, then instead reverting, you need to go to the article talk page and start a discussion, and we'll see what/if any orher editors have to say. - w o lf  10:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Insert non-formatted text here
 * I noticed your edit. You said something about the infobox?123.103.210.114 (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

USS North Carolina (SSN-777)
A discussion regarding a matter you are involved in has been started on this article talk page, here. - w o lf  11:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Block evasion
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at M20 motorway, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Except that adding a news report is NOT considered Advertising you fking little weasel.

Personal attacks
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 11:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Nice try, but the comment still exists. 123.103.210.114 (talk) 11:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No it does not exist anymore Notrealname1234 (talk) 16:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * But it does exist. In the edit summary. 123.103.210.114 (talk) 10:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * And you won't be making comments for a while ...

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh yes I will. Just made nearly half a dozen edits using VPNs. And thank you Elon Musk for Starlink! 123.103.210.114 (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)