User talk:123.209.79.8

August 2023
Hello, I'm Grumpylawnchair. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Ng Wai Chiu, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! <span style="background-color:black; color:white; padding: 3px; Grumpylawnchair  ( talk ) 03:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Grumpylawnchair. You have incorrectly removed my edit on this post. Please revert it.
 * Wikipedia allows me to cite offline sources (Wikipedia:Offline sources - Wikipedia) which in this case I have done. There is firm evidence, written (in the individuals own credential-assured content), voice recordings (of the individual) and photographic material (photos sent by the individual in question). This material is available for any editor requesting to review.
 * I also note:
 * "On Wikipedia, we assume good faith. There is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. Offline sources are just as legitimate as those that are accessible to everyone online. If offline sources, even exclusively offline sources, are used to reference an article, we give the creator (and other contributors) the benefit of the doubt in accepting their accuracy."
 * "If an editor seeking deletion believes the creator placed fictitious references in the article to make a hoax seem legitimate, the burden of proof is on the one seeking deletion. This will only occur with definitive proof or knowledge that these sources are really fictitious, and not based simply on a hunch. As with the offline sources themselves, online proof that they do not exist is not needed." 2001:8003:220D:8C00:249E:201B:A019:D52C (talk) 05:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)