User talk:123.231.111.137

October 2016
Hello, I'm Dharmalion76. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Buddhist meditation have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Dharmalion76 (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Nothing "promotional" about updating the page with current research. No commercial value in any reference cited, as these are all public sources.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Upekkha. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dharmalion76 (talk) 08:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Please refrain from making judgments about the promotional nature of the text and citation without reading the source material cited. It is very unprofessional and un-Buddhist like.  You can't expect improvements to this text with the latest research on the topic if you label anything that enhances general knowledge about equanimity as 'promotion'.  Equanimity is an established practice going back to the time of the Buddha, and testing the effectiveness of this practice using current neuroscience to determine whether a balanced state of mind is cultivated through the practice is highly relevant to the general interest in equanimity in this section, and does not promote any particular point of view.  Either it is effective or it is not based on science. The promotion section of Wiki concerns 'self' promotion or promoting a particular point of view, and if you think 'promotion' means more than that you must state clearly the additional scope you think should be part of Wiki's effort to not engage in promotional acitivites, so other editors can weigh in concerning this is really part of the promotion Wiki intends to prohibit.  Reverting edits based on vague, conclusory judgments without any supporting detail is disrespectful to the time taken by editors to try to improve Wiki pages.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JimRenge (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

I get the impression you might be edit warring using several IP´s. Please stop it, wikipedia does not accept self-published sources per WP:SPS. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm RainFall. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Polo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. —RainFall 08:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)