User talk:123.878G

July 2024
Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jason Pusey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Jason Pusey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I came across this in recent changes. This sort of information needs a source secondary to the police, and the only ones I can find are tabloids, some copied verbatim from the Daily Mail. Please do not restore this unless and until better sourcing is available. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * OK. I'm looking at Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources and some of the potential sources: Evening Standard is "no consensus", Mirror is "no consensus". Since this is a BLP will not revert. Thanks for the heads-up. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)