User talk:123Peacock123

Welcome!
Hi 123Peacock123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Zim Zala Bim talk 22:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Also note that some of your changes to company articles were reverted because your changes didn't adhere to our naming conventions. -- Zim Zala Bim talk 22:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Best Buy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''I've already noted that you are changing articles in a way that goes against policy at WP:NCCORP. Please stop.'' Zim Zala Bim  talk 02:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Life with Lucy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Zim Zala Bim talk 02:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at CBS All Access, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding incorrect or unsourced info to articles. BilCat (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I'll log out of Wikipedia.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at CBS All Access. ''Please stop. You know that the name hasn't been changed yet.'' BilCat (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at CHiPs, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on CBS All Access; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

LISTEN YOU! I WILL BLOCK YOU FROM EDITING IF YOU KEEP ACTING CHILDISH AND RUDE TO ME, 123Peacock123! YOU FIGURE OUT SOMETHING TO STOP THIS EDIT WAR RIGHT NOW!! I'LL BE WAITING!!!!!!!

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 00:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm1234567890

January 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 UTRS decline I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here " . Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see

. Courtesy ping   -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 04:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Noting now revdel'd legal threat. Please see WP:NLT. This is one more issue that must be dealt with for consideration of unblocking. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 00:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)