User talk:123jac123

Hi
I replied to your message here. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stevens v Sony
Hi Stephen,

Hope you're well.

I am new to the world of wiki. i just figured out how to make the infobox- its a crazy digital world we live in. Anyway, i have written an article about a law case study and am looking for any tips of getting it beyond start quality. Was wondering if you'd be interested in giving any suggestions or could lead me in the right direction? I have added the case study below. Also, i had a word limit of 2500 words, so its quite a brief summary. is it too late to change that from the title.

Any thoughts let me know,

Thanks in advance :)

Stevens V Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment (2005)

123jac123 (talk) 06:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi there, sorry for not replying before now. It's good you've worked out the infobox. Some other useful templates are the Cite Case AU template, which gives links to cases on AustLII, and Cite Legislation AU, which does the same thing for legislation. In terms of style you could take a look at some of the other existing Australian case law articles and see how they look: they're in Category:Australian case law.
 * One thing you could do is to add some links to the article - see Help:Link if you don't know how. Because we don't do original research here on Wikipedia, you should probably also revise the last section, in which you currently engage in the debate somewhat - Wikipedia writing merely lays out the contours of the academic debate, just as a basic literature review might do.
 * Otherwise it looks pretty good. I'll have to dig out my copyright notes this week and see what else I could add :) --bainer (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)