User talk:123music

Copyright problems with THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: THE MUSICAL
Hello. Concerning your contribution, THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: THE MUSICAL, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: THE MUSICAL appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: THE MUSICAL has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Removal of a copyright violation tag is vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: THE MUSICAL
Your comments on Talk:THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: THE MUSICAL are patently untrue. And please provide proof that not only is the information on the cited page under the GFDL, but you have the rights to release it thus. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 00:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact, the cited page specifically says Copyright © 1999-2009 ChristianCinema.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

The Ten Commandments: The Musical
Hi, you have undone the work of previous editors who have cleaned up this article. I have therefore reverted your edits. Smartse (talk) 19:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, we have received the authorization to publish this information. It has been approved by Wikipedia by the following tickets: Re: [Ticket#2009051110034908] PERMISSIONS TO USE THE MATERIALfor page THE TEN COMMANDMENTS THE MUSICAL Therefore, we would appreciate if you could revert the edits in particular the reference information as it was noted in the headline that additional references were needed. In the future, it would be great if you could check with the person entering the information prior to deleting information. The process is quite difficult without having unfounded interferences.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TransCash Corporation


A tag has been placed on TransCash Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bluefist (talk) 01:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TransCash Corporation


A tag has been placed on TransCash Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

re TransCash Corporation deletion
Are you under the impression that you can copy material from a press release? I can understand why some might think so, but it is still a violation of copyright.

Please contact me at my talk page if you'd like to discuss it further.-- SPhilbrick  T  02:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TransCash Corporation


A tag has been placed on TransCash Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of TransCash Corporation and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

TransCash Corporation
I have deleted the TransCash Corporation article because it was entirely promotional. The purpose of Wikipedia is not to advertise or explain products to customers, it is to give readers neutral, encyclopaedic information about notable topics. Also the article should be about either the corporation or the product, not both. I suggest that before you try again you read the guide to writing your first article. Thryduulf (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)