User talk:124.168.98.236

March 2022
Hello, I'm Jackfork. I noticed that you recently removed content from New South Wales XPT without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 20:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to New South Wales Xplorer. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Fork99 (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New South Wales XPT, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 06:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, or violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did with these two edits to New South Wales XPT, you may be blocked from editing. Edgar Searle (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at FlyPelican. Ajf773 (talk) 01:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)