User talk:124.169.237.27

November 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Toy Story (franchise), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at André Sogliuzzo, you may be blocked from editing. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at André Sogliuzzo. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 22:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on André Sogliuzzo; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 09:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:OVERLINK and stop adding links to United States in bio articles. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 09:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John de Lancie. -- WikiPedant (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John de Lancie. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bobby Helms. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Phil Foster shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)