User talk:124.170.5.13

You have a section on 'Claims of medical efficacy' - which does not hint at the total lack scientific evidence; other than the word claim. This page thus lends its weight to the slaughter of an endangered animal. I refer you to the section on tigers, which details that "There is no scientific evidence to support these beliefs" - & has a paragraph outlining the negative aspects of this trade. Today the main uses of pangolin scales is in haemorrhaging blood into the lungs, causing death by drowning in the resulting cytokine storm. This 'Claim of medical efficacy' has much better scientific provenance - than any other such claim on your page.