User talk:125.235.238.149

Slow down?
Hey there. You've now added archiving to three pages on my watchlist, suggesting you are adding archiving to a ton of pages. Do you have consensus for this? Also, I notice you're not adding the standard archiving configuration mentioned at Help:Archiving a talk page, but some uncommon configuration that can result in there being zero sections left on a talk page, which is in my opinion not ideal and not the standard. Would you consider changing your MiszaBot config settings to match Help:Archiving a talk page going forward? Thanks. – Novem Linguae (talk) 00:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I'm going so to add more time to archive but I know, since open archive and now can keep calm and have archive for some time, including made some sections in this page and sometimes, I want add User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis to confirm with archive formatting in one more time. So, this is a mid-serious to archive and made it onto the top. Thanks for the help, I want to slow down if I can and wish to do for the section to made some of talk page is more sections as soon as possible. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 00:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

So, if can come to add another archive talk page, I want to made some sections to archive and go for it. Lowercase sigmabot III is a good bot to complete archive without some mistakes and cannot wait to add archive with some sections will archive in next time and some sections will archive shortly. Thank you! 125.235.238.149 (talk) 00:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * As an FYI, I am reverting your attempts to add archiving for multiple pages where I do not see any evidence that you discussed this with other editors first. Given that you aren't a registered user and that your communication skills seem...imperfect...I have concerns about you doing this without having apparently discussed it with anyone first. You would be much better off asking for permission for this kind of mass-editing before making such changes. DonIago (talk) 02:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's especially concerning that you would edit the archiving for user Talk pages without any evident communication with those users. Please do not make any more edits of this nature without a clear consensus to do so. DonIago (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If clear Consensus to do so, I make any future edits in all more time and required to having an sections in talk pages and so much mores. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand what you're saying here. DonIago (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if understand in this consensus policy, I can want to edit in the all more time. I'm too bad, but can clear this consensus to make a great work, but I don’t know what make an new things in this page, I'm sorry for the inconvenience. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You now have two editors who have asked you to stop. I think you should stop immediately and not resume. Linking WP:CONSENSUS in edit summaries is not sufficient. Is there a different editing activity you could do instead? – Novem Linguae (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, I’m going to add something else outside the archive because is not sufficient, example: Lists of films by studio. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 09:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

STOP INSERTING AUTO-ARCHIVING ON TALK PAGES. You have been editing for two days, and the great majority of your edits have been to install a version of auto-archiving. There already is auto-archiving for Talk pages. What you have done is not an improvement. David notMD (talk) 09:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I’m not being blocked, but ask to stop add another archive on talk pages. Wikipedia is an great encyclopedia but not being ask you to continue archive so need to stop before very too late. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * At Teahouse, I have suggested that your editing activity on Talk pages be reviewed by an Administrator, and all of your edits reverted. David notMD (talk) 09:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, in the meantime, if all Administrators not blocked me, I going to stop after doing so in 2 days ago and make sure no one beings blocked me and not being around to go back in archive again. Now can be added some more. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 09:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 125.235.238.149‎‎: possible CIR and meatbot issues. Thank you. – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks you, I don’t want to get violation of MEATBOT when set up archive bot and can’t go back to archive and sure IP continue as soon right now. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It is difficult to understand much of what you write. If English is not your first language, you may feel better if you contribute to the Wikipedia of your primary language. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don’t want to get violation of MEATBOT when set up archive bot makes it sound like you plan to stop, and IP continue as soon right now makes it sound like you plan to continue. Can you please clarify? – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I’m not help for anything else to continue archive and if go back to archive, it’s not good to me. Now don’t blocked by Administrator and continue to edits with some article if I can. 125.235.238.149 (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Spicy (talk) 23:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.