User talk:125.238.51.86

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Clyde Graf has been reverted. Your edit here to Clyde Graf was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD9oJ8UE3VA&t=7s) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm PolyversialMind. I noticed that you recently removed content from Clyde Graf without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PolyversialMind (talk) 03:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Clyde Graf. ''Please discuss these changes on the article's Talk page rather than repeatedly removing content. At the moment it looks like statements with a valid source supporting them, so it is difficult for other editors to see why you want to remove them. Please also be aware that if you are, or represent, the subject of the article, you should not edit the article directly, but post on the Talk page. See the conflict of interest guidance.'' Tacyarg (talk) 08:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Defamation
What do you do when authors keep adding inaccurate information to an article, in a context which renders it defamatory? It's already been the subject of a defamation payment by a newspaper. I have tried deleting it, but they keep re-posting it. Advice please. 125.238.51.86 (talk) 04:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Please add a more detailed explanation in your edit summaries to indicate that editors should review the information currently on the page, rather than deleting information that should not be omitted at a quick glance while leaving a vague or null explanation. To fully explain your situation, please use the talk page on the article itself. PolyversialMind (talk) 04:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

3RR warning
Your recent editing history at Clyde Graf shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Pokelova (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Pokelova (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)