User talk:125.99.219.189

July 2019
Your recent editing history at I Saw the Devil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to its right form, when you have seen that I disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I will get you kicked out of here.  Slightlymad  (talk &sdot; contribs) 09:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Are you trying to terrorize me? I'm sorry if my edits hurt your ego that much. I will never touch this page again unless someone else comes in support. Good luck with your edits. (125.99.219.189 (talk) 10:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC))

August 2019
Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  18:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mission Mangal, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You call that vandalism? You need to first get your own facts right. (125.99.219.189 (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2019 (UTC))

Sources have drawn data from Wikipedia only, much before you added them. No space film based on true events is a sci-fi. I don't care about those two sources. They aren't official ones. (125.99.219.189 (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC))
 * Raise the issue in the talk page and wait for others to discuss. If you revert like that, you'll likely get banned. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Threaten me later, visit the talk page first. There's one debate already started on 7 August but no one's looking at it. And please don't threaten me only because I disagree with your opinion. Whatever I did was only afer reading what the issue was on talk page. (125.99.219.189 (talk) 18:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC))
 * That was not a threat. Your disruptive edits can get you banned. As far as the talk page is concerned, you should be discussing there to get to a consensus rather than POV pushing the article. Call people from WP:ICTF if you want. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Sir, what's wrong with you? Okay, I won't make the edits because I don't want to be banned. That's it. But why don't you too discuss it at the talk page where, as I said previously, a discussion is already started by a user. I hate to repeat myself but I had to edit the page only after reading what the user had to say. He had a point. The Right Stuff, ﻿Apollo 13﻿, ﻿Hidden Figures﻿, and ﻿First Man are the films that deal with space but are not classified sci-fi since they are based on real life events. I hope you can understand, sir. I'm sorry for my rudeness. Please forgive me :) (125.99.219.189 (talk) 18:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC))
 * If the discussion is open then wait for people to come and opine. The discussion was posted on 7th August, why are you in a hurry? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry if I sound hurried, but the film's about to release in less than a week and we can't give the viewers a wrong idea about what to expect from a film. Even IMDb doesn't classify this as a sci-fi. (125.99.219.189 (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC))
 * Wait. I'll put my views and call a few others. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:32, 9 August 2019 (UTC)