User talk:126.243.85.139

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 126.243.85.139, has made edits to Peacebuilding in Jammu and Kashmir that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome; Disagree with your reasoning for revert of the contributory edit to the "Peacebuilding In Jammu and Kashmir" article. Speaking in response to recent statements from Indian media a few days ago, the responsible minister of state (Foreign Minister Qureishi) for the Diplomatic Corp of Pakistan used the term "state-level". Of course, India uses the term state for the provincial organs, so in the lede of the article, (previously "National-level") the edit was to ease the readers across the use of Colonial English by using the term "nation-state level". For context, the diplomat was impacted by allegations that Pakistan supported the group which claimed responsibility for a recent massive explosion resulting in the deaths of more than 40 soldiers returning from Jammu, as his level of responsibility is at the highest level, and not in the "Track two diplomacy" immediately following the edited term. Such abhorrent acts by "non-state actors" are an affront to official Diplomats, and common ground should be understood. Again, thank you.126.243.85.139 (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Peacebuilding in Jammu and Kashmir. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talk:Ilhan Omar
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

No-one has been "attacked" by wikipedia contributions from this IP, although you may well disagree.126.243.85.139 (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Err....."their" opinion? In what way does writing an acronym in twitter or whatever constitute an opinion? Furthermore, if one were so quick to throw around (yet) unsubstantiated accusations, a quick statistical audit of the deletions, contributions, and other "edits" made from your username may well result in indications that Wikieditor19920 is predominately engaged in editing of Noahide-ethno associated articles moreso than general contribs thus may well fall within the scope of Single-Use account, unless you operate several wikipedia accounts or are a member of some army of socks. That's a personal attack under any interpretation. This is a friendly warning. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 19:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC) I`m afraid of you r comments made earlier on the same talkpage, in which you may well have attacked and assuaged a half-dozen others. Perhaps you lack understanding of the words "borderline", "indicate", and "may well result in indications". Stop wasting my time and energy unless you have done such a statistical audit, fullstop. Good Day126.243.85.139 (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)