User talk:126.3.60.195

October 2018
Your recent editing history at Killing of Jamal Khashoggi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for your notification(s) here on this talkpage; Firstly, the editing done on the article in question from this IP has been primarily to ensure the article reflects the reality of the CONTEXT of the victim and the persons/groups who sought to exploit or harm the victim, who is likely now deceased, with consideration of timing. The victim, Jamal Khashoggi, was a writer and editor for newsmedia in several countries, and it might have been frowned upon to have cited references from his own work. Several editors of wikipedia have come aboard the article in question, which has been heavily edited over the past week. The See also section of the article shows 17 other wikipedia articles, many of which are not related to the killing of Khashoggi; the most glaring omission in light of the depth of the article is the concerted removal of the Israeli smartphonetapping. Wikipedia is not the place to explain that the Israelis have been selling weapons, or trying to sell (even nuclear weapons to Apartheid Regime of South Africa) weapons, high-tech IT products (and smartphone-hacking tools), to 'Tyrants, Dictators, and Oppressive Regimes', and that they have done so successfully and consistently, whether cruise missiles and AWACS and drones to China, or cruise missiles and drones anti-missile-missiles to Saudi Arabia. In this case, it is not about Israeli bombs dropping on Yemen by American aircraft operated by the Saudi Airforce, it is about smartphone hacking-for-hire, and has been reported in mainstream media in several countries and regions, 'including in a newsmedia outlet of the victim', around six months before the victim was killed. The most recent addition of the smartphone-hacking-for-hire referenced published material of the very day of the dissappearance of the victim, not published by the victim, but covering the same topic of the victim`s April article in middleeastmonitor, which may have been frowned upon had it been referenced. Given that the See also section has a wide range of links, it cannot be appropriate to further delete info (or prevent further reading on it) if the smartphone-hacking-for-hire matter is included in that section, which shall be done subsequent to this notice. Thank you for your continued rational and intellectually-honest reaction.~ The victim was hacked by the Israelis (perhaps also as proxies of Saudi Arabian), and a self-described "colleague" of the victim was likewise hacked by the Israelis, the latter upon which a story was written in the victims press, six months prior to the disappearance. The references are there, the historical precedent of such operations is there, and it remains tabooed in the MSM, and 'sadly' here on wikipedia. Further deletion of, or prevention of further reading of, the smartphone-hacking-for-hire material shall grant ample cause for this 3RR exemption notice to be upheld. Any attempts to block this IP will have been done out of intellectual dishonesty and will have been done shamelessly126.3.60.195 (talk) 21:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Read WP:CONSENSUS and WP:GREATWRONG and build WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page at Talk:Killing_of_Jamal_Khashoggi to add it into the article. Do not add without a Consensus. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  21:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Please note that there is no 3RR exemption for you. and this IP range will still be blocked if you break the rules. Read WP:RS and WP:CONSENSUS follow them if you would like to avoid being blocked. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  22:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)