User talk:128.151.71.11

April 2019
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The dress— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 15:41, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The dress. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 15:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The dress, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The dress. Serols (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rochester, New York has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:30, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rochester, New York was changed by 128.151.71.11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850698 on 2019-11-03T05:30:14+00:00

September 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Byrds Play Dylan has been reverted. Your edit here to The Byrds Play Dylan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/The-Byrds-The-Byrds-Play-Dylan/release/2547854) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

WP:WAS and WP:PRESENT
Hi -- there was a discussion recently that updated WP:WAS, and WP:PRESENT should have been updated to match. Can you stop making the changes for now? I'll put links to the relevant discussions here in a moment. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd rather not. The old rule made sense. Magazines don't stop existing because new issues aren't coming out. 128.151.71.11 (talk) 14:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The discussion that established this rule is here. There are plenty of people who agree with you, but that turned out to be the minority position -- as you'll see there was a lot of discussion about it.  Now that it's specified in the manual of style, you would have to start another discussion to change it back.  Without that we should stick to what the style guide currently says -- the justification for sticking to the style guide is that it prevents back-and-forth edits such as these. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Making this rule will only add to confusion, since no sensible person would think there was a difference between a magazine no longer published and a tv show no longer produced. But Wikipedia stupid is as Wikipedia stupid does, so I'll follow the guidelines. 128.151.71.11 (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have sympathy for the view that "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds", but I think it's worth it to avoid pointlessly changing things back and forth. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Blazing Saddles have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Blazing Saddles was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/hjwwro/til_blazing_saddles_had_a_television_spin_off/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2020
Hello, I'm CreativeNorth. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CreativeNorth (talk) 16:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021
Hello, I'm Belwine. Your recent edit(s) to the page Little Orphan Annie (radio series) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  It was an American radio drama series, as it ended many years ago.  Belwine  • 💬 • 📜 14:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.