User talk:128.151.71.24

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Fairfax, Vermont has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 15:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to T cell receptor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: T cell receptor was changed by 128.151.71.24 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-05-21T15:43:13+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

July 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —72 talk 19:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Islamberg, New York, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Pete Power, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Johand199. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Vandalism is pointless—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Johand 199 (Talk)  15:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Richard Herring, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 13:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Bath bomb because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bath bomb. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me  &#8226; contribs) 18:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Foxe (April 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Foxe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Damian_Foxe Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Damian_Foxe reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)