User talk:128.177.31.180

October 2023
Hello, I'm Captainllama. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Chuck Feeney, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''I see you have added honorifics to several persons with the comment "check if you want". That's not how it works, if you are adding something it is for YOU to reference a reliable source, not for another editor to do your work for you. Fortunately in most of your additions the reference was already in the article, I have removed the addition where it was not. Please go ahead and re-add - so long as you also provide a source. Cheers!'' Captainllama (talk) 23:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, James Carlisle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Action Bronson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Post-nominals
Please stop adding postnominals to articles about people who have not been subjects of the issuing sovereign. MOS:POSTNOM addresses this point. 2601:642:4600:3F80:A070:5547:5D9F:E357 (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * so? what about it.
 * even though, its an honorary honour, duh. 128.177.31.180 (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bárbara de Regil, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Henry van der Heyden, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please see WP:CATDEF. Categories must be verifiable based on article content. Schazjmd   (talk)''  21:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Russian-Jewish descent
Are you using a reliable source to back the changes that you are making, such as | this one? Joyous! Noise! 18:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David Aaronovitch. '''You have continued to place articles in categories that are not supported by sourced content in the articles. These are biographies of living people. Please stop adding categories except when they are fully supported by sourced content. Schazjmd'   (talk)''  18:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sharon Jaklofsky, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. '''Adding unsourced ethnic categories to articles of living people violates the WP:BLP policy. STOP. You were blocked before for this. Schazjmd'   (talk)''  23:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2024
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Luis Frangella, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. — AP 499D25  (talk)  00:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at D'arcy Wretzky. Binksternet (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stella Casey. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.