User talk:128.197.29.229

December 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, A* search algorithm. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Politanvm talk 23:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jules Dameron (April 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jules Dameron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jules_Dameron Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Numberguy6&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jules_Dameron reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Chip Tsao have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. JeffSpaceman (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chip Tsao. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   18:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chip Tsao, you may be blocked from editing. JeffSpaceman (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 18:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Chip Tsao. JeffSpaceman (talk) 18:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC)