User talk:129.100.253.83

January 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GFAJ-1. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dave Brubeck has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to GFAJ-1 has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GFAJ-1 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to R v Nur with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to GFAJ-1 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: GFAJ-1 was changed by 129.100.253.83 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882991 on 2016-01-20T20:18:03+00:00.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southwold Scorpions (January 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southwold Scorpions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Southwold_Scorpions Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wiae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Southwold_Scorpions reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae  /tlk  13:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Southwold Scorpions


Hello, 129.100.253.83. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Southwold Scorpions".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shania Twain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shania Twain was changed by 129.100.253.83 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875169 on 2016-11-03T22:37:06+00:00.

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Quantum mechanics has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Quantum mechanics was changed by 129.100.253.83 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961134 on 2017-03-09T20:12:03+00:00.

Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. Your recent edit to the page Potassium appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plant surfer 20:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jonak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm 211.202.20.103. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brampton have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 211.202.20.103 (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brampton. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brampton was changed by 129.100.253.83 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854557 on 2017-12-04T17:18:48+00:00.

March 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Denis Margalik have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Denis Margalik, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 01:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)