User talk:129.100.255.33

November 2018
Hello, I'm Natureium. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Retrotransposon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Natureium (talk) 23:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tullimonstrum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― A Poor Historian (talk) 15:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Directional selection. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 17:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)