User talk:129.234.0.30

June 2014
I would like the second and third of my edits to the oval office to be brought back. The first edit was vandalism (having wee bit of fun) but the other two were legitimate grammatical clean ups. When the vandalism was removed they also removed the bits that made the article better (not even mentioning the egregious misuse of rollback). Please reinstate my edits. 129.234.0.30 (talk) 18:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm afraid that's what happens when you vandalise; you lose credibility. However, I took a look and the edits are not clearly improvements: the structure "he xxxed, xxxing ... and xxxing ..." is not wrong as opposed to "he xxxed; he xxxed and xxxed", nor is it unclear&mdash;they're alternative ways of saying the same thing. So I didn't reinstate the changes. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

November 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anne, Queen of Great Britain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 12:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Accredited investor, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  15:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sweatpants— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. gadfium 21:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Fort Myers Senior High School
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Shaun ♣  ༆  23:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Donald Love. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cranmer Hall, Durham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 10:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Hello, I'm Quinton Feldberg. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Harry Bishop (politician)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

January 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peyronie's disease. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jacenty359 (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Samrat (name) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.