User talk:129.240.213.52

February 2020
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pseudoscience, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pseudoscience, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 16:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

If they are using the scientific method, they can also post in mainstream peer reviewed journals, replicate experiments, their hypotheses should be falsifiable, etc. This is where it is equivalent to saying mainstream science already (there is well done science and pseudoscience, which is what the article is about). — Paleo Neonate  – 13:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)