User talk:129.67.111.33

October 2022
Hello, I'm EchidnaLives. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Eve of the Daleks—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. echidnaLives (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Revolution of the Daleks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wesoree (Talk) 23:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Truss ministry, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Matt Hancock
Hey, I share much of your distaste for Matt Hancock... nevertheless wikipedia must be encyclopedic and a prominent "when he's actually in the country" might detract from other useful parts of the article like talking about he threatened to ban all exercise, banned sexual relations and then had an extramarital with a University friend who he had hired as an assistant. I suspect that his actions will be quite sufficient to help readers form their opinions of the human without any need for our editorial input Talpedia (talk) 23:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have used an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sumanuil.  (talk to me) 23:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits like you did at Talk:Rishi Sunak. Thank you. Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not making "unconstructive edits", I'm suggesting a change. If you think it's not a good change, which I'm guessing is the case, just tell me why. There's no need to insult me instead. 129.67.111.33 (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not insult you. However, those of us who contribute constructively at Wikipedia believe in good faith, which is why I will give you the benefit of the doubt. I rejected it, one of the reasons being it was untrue and therefore unfit to appear on Wikipedia.
 * Cordially, Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. 129.67.111.33 (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Boris Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. — Czello 18:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)