User talk:129.67.18.79

December 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Eva Kaili, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * My apologies I just saw this. quite simply the claim left as it was, unsubstantiated, was an extremely partisan one that definitely does not take into account the reality of the situation nor the specificities of greek politics. As it was written is was misleading at the very least and as a doctoral candidate in european political science and after discussing it with other academics in my office we all agreed about the inadequacy of the prior wording 129.67.18.79 (talk) 20:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Eva Kaili. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Carolina2k22 • (talk)  •  (edits)  20:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * how is what is now in any way a neutral point of view? this is obviously written by someone from that party as literally no one outside of it believes or can believe that. maybe the wording i chose was wrong for which i apologise but restoring it to the previous version is certainly an analysis under the cover of neutrality. 129.67.18.79 (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)