User talk:12Dagge

March 2017
Hello, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Time Cube have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McGeddon (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tobias Hübinette


The article Tobias Hübinette has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black Lives Matter, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Last warning
Stop disruptively editing (i.e., putting in material at odds with the sources in an effort to distort or disparage). Neutralitytalk 23:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * When your article about Tobias H was deleted and you got a warning (section here under) I checked all your edits since you started here, and I think that you really need to think what you are doing on enwp. Neutrality warned you last August. I understand. Almost all of your edits have been reverted. Svenglish, bad sourcing or no source at all, own research et cetera. It is a wonder you are not blocked yet. If I had seen this from a user on svwp I would have blocked you at once, because the rest of the comunity should not have to check everything you do. Adville (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tobias Hübinette


A tag has been placed on Tobias Hübinette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. RolandR (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add content or create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 20:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
Hi, 12Dagge. After taking a look at your editing in general, I have to agree with User:Adville's warning above. In view of the warnings on this page, and especially of the fact that you recreated Tobias Hübinette as a pure attack page after User:Neutrality's "final warning", I have blocked you indefinitely. I'm not saying your intentions are necessarily bad, but your editing on the English Wikipedia has been a net negative IMO, especially because of tendentious and/or unsourced additions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC).