User talk:130.126.255.122

Your draft article, Draft:Praxis Advertising


Hello, 130.126.255.122. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Praxis Advertising".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

April 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frozen (2013 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brother Jed. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sausage roll. You have already been told multiple times that original research of this type is inappropriate. Scjessey (talk) 16:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Sausage rolls
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Sausage roll. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. There's a talk page thread about this at Talk:Sausage_roll: please do join in the conversation there. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)