User talk:130.132.173.230

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider  [ creating an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (130.132.173.230) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 01:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia talk:Protection policy
Hi. I noted that you made an edit to Wikipedia talk:Protection policy that appeared to be requesting a change to an edit protected page. This sort of request should be made at the talk page for the article you want edited, not at Wikipedia talk:Protection policy. In addition, please listed exactly what you want changed and what you want it changed to (e.g. change "X" to "Y"). --Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 21:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Sholam Weiss
Hi, regarding your edit removing links to Weiss' personal websites, I thought it was clear that the websites were sources for Weiss' position in his current proceedings, that is, it was not an attempt to masquerade them as impartial sources. Lexjuris (talk) 04:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Lexjuris

I am still waiting your response. The entry was a statement of Weiss' present position about his case. It is available in a court document, which is cited, but that is not available by links. Thus, the link to the website was, which states his point of view. It is thus not "masquerading". It is explicitly his point of view. That is the whole point of the entry: what is Weiss' present argument? So why is that link improper? Lexjuris (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)