User talk:130.156.22.252

March 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ted Kennedy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 16:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Benjamin A. Smith II, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 16:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 16:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Taylor Swift, you may be blocked from editing. Ippantekina (talk) 02:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Why do you prefer the eyesore that is the redundancy of putting Taylor's Version after every new incarnation of her past works when it's only needed once? Help me to understand why your way is better when it's redundant over my edit which is clean and orderly? 130.156.22.252 (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Wasell. I noticed that you recently removed content from Karl Pearson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —  Wasell ( T ) 05:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karl Pearson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karl Pearson, you may be blocked from editing. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)