User talk:130.226.157.37

November 2021
Hello, I'm Meters. Your recent edit(s) to the page No Nut November appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

August 2022
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against men (5th nomination). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not attacking anyone, I am calling out obvious biased editing by another user that needs to be called out because they are are actively attacking and sabotaging an article on male victims. I suggest reverting all changes made by Tambor de Tocino as all they have done is remove sources to make the articles seem less well founded, remove important parts and inserted their own charged language, fx they changed "Men are over-represented as both victims and perpetrators of violence." to
 * "Men are over-represented as both perpetrators and victims of violence." Removing sources and shifting the focus from men as victims to perpetrators. Why one would write about men as perpertrators in an article about male victims in the first place is highly dubious and indicative of anti male bias, but the fact they went out of their way to change the focus of the sentence reveals that their actions are nothing but anti male attacks. You should go talk with them about their actions instead of trying to silence my valid criticism of their actions. I will not stop calling out misandry and anti male behavior, thank you very much. Have nice day. 130.226.157.37 (talk) 11:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Violence against men, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not disruptive editing, you are, I am merely correcting your bad faith edditiong. Please cease your false accusations, If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Violence against men, you may be blocked from editing as I will report you. 130.226.157.37 (talk) 12:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You can stop your lies at this moment, your are the one actively sabotaging the violence against males inserting your own biased claims and deleting important content. I will be reporting you and so will others for these bad faith attacks. 130.226.157.37 (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Violence against men. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --LordPeterII (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I have not attacked anyone, please cease these false accusations as they are an obvious intimidation attack. If a person engage in obvious discriminatory and hostile attacks then that must be called out. I have done nothing but accurately and correctly point out anti male bias and attacks on Talk:Violence against men.If you continue your false accusations, you may be blocked from editing. I will never ever stop from calling out sexist bias against men and I would prefer you stop trying to intimidate me from doing so. Thank you, have a nice day.
 * Ps: this a public IP and not my home IP so it makes no difference if you try to silence me and male victims.
 * In fact, this a brilliant example of how violence against men are supported and the victims silenced. 130.226.157.37 (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Violence against men, you may be blocked from editing. ''If you really believe that a group of Wikipedia editors who are trying to save that article from deletion, several of which (including me) are actually male, are trying to "sabotage" it and "silence male victims", then please just leave and use your energy elswhere. I have this page watchlisted, so even if you use another IP to attack people and edit disruptively, that one will just be blocked as well. Sorry.'' --LordPeterII (talk) 13:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Violence against men. --LordPeterII (talk) 13:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Katietalk 13:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)