User talk:131.137.245.208

Conflict of Interest
Hello, 131.137.245.208. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). '''Note: Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines, especially before editing any articles related to the Canadian military or government. Thank you - the WOLF ' child '' 21:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

December 2009
Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Freshfighter9 (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ibn (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Hole (band) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 22:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dik-dik. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 22:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Duongld has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 19:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 17:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, USS Saratoga (CV-3). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Your edit can be seen here. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 15:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Ottawa municipal election, 2010. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tom my! 12:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mopar. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 23:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mopar, you may be blocked from editing. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 16:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your editing privileges have been suspended for 3 months
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Elizabeth May, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Canadian Forces, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BC talk to me  14:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Marek Zidlicky, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dolovis (talk) 03:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:L1A1 FAL/Rhodesian camouflage. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Unless you are communicating via a talk page, do not edit pages in my own, or anyone else's user space without permission L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Real Tennis
While I found your edits to be quite funny, I had to revert them, as we are a serious encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for test edits or nonsense. Thank you. Joefromrandb (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Continent, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 18:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Andranik Madadian, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃  00:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Salem's Lot (1979 TV miniseries)  plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Royal Canadian Air Force, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Humberside Collegiate Institute, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Echoedmyron (talk) 18:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Principle of good enough, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Image intensifier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  22:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tesla coil, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Chetvorno TALK 17:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salton Sea (novel)


Hello 131.137.245.208. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Salton Sea (novel)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Classification of demons
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Classification of demons article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  TheQ Editor    (Talk) 16:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm Tartarus. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Honda CR-X del Sol because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! T artarus talk 19:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gun politics in Canada. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 19:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Equerry with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 12:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Brian Crawford. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Royal Canadian Air Force, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BC talk to me  17:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2015
Hello, I'm Eduardofeld. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to H. H. Holmes— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. E. Feld talk 14:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 21:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Charles Moore Grant, 9th Baron de Longueuil has been accepted
 John Charles Moore Grant, 9th Baron de Longueuil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Smmurphy(Talk) 15:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

March 2017
Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:List of commonly misused English words— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mess. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 08:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Toronto Maple Leafs, you may be blocked from editing. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Era styles
Era styles, ie AD/CE need to be made only in accordance with WP:ERA and Easter Island is a CE article, so I've reverted you. Doug Weller talk 18:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pluot. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, I'm Harmon758. An edit that you recently made to Royal 22nd Regiment seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Harmon758 (talk) 15:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Commander, Naval Surface Forces Pacific, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  21:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Logistics Branch, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rational Youth has been reverted. Your edit here to Rational Youth was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/RationalYouth/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Contaminable memory (February 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Contaminable memory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Contaminable memory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Contaminable_memory Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:L293D&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Contaminable_memory reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b> • <b style="color:#000">✎</b>) 15:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chłędowski coat of arms, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. I see nothing in that article suggesting that the coat of arms is notable, and there are still user-generated sources. Meters (talk) 15:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to William Hall (VC)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Area codes 416, 647, and 437, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I'm Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021
Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page The Hum appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)