User talk:131.215.220.164

October 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Esrever (klaT) 15:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Nitrogen narcosis
Thanks very much for the citation you provided for Nitrogen narcosis. It was research that I was unaware of - and is valuable to cite for the article's reference to ligand-gated ion channels as well (I've used it again for that paragraph). Cheers --RexxS (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Spindle neuron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 04:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Tim meh  !  00:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of California Institute of Technology trustees, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of California Institute of Technology trustees was changed by 131.215.220.164 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-10-24T08:31:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

August 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aphid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joja lozzo  22:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to House System at the California Institute of Technology because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry (unit). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to House System at the California Institute of Technology— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 01:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm TheGoodAndHolyLord. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Todd Duffee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Let's Talk! 21:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anima Anandkumar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 20:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Amitabh Varshney, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! HouseBlastertalk 23:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm RodRabelo7. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Gram–Schmidt process have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)