User talk:131.239.119.174

July 2022
Hello, I'm The Herald. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to New England Aquarium have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at New England Aquarium, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New England Aquarium. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 16:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that triggered the edit filter. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duan Jianyu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 14:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Town—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 14:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Computer Edition of Risk: The World Conquest Game. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Janet Yellen, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   12:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Janet Yellen. DB 1729 talk 12:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page John Cabot, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Silikonz 💬 19:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Matt Canada—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 (T / C / L) — 17:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dorian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 19:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MaterialWorks. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Homing pigeon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Material Works (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Worcester, Massachusetts, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thecowboygilbert -  (talk) ♥  18:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Worcester, Massachusetts, you may be blocked from editing. Thecowboygilbert -  (talk) ♥  18:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked again
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)