User talk:132.147.63.200

August 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to James Mason (neo-Nazi), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 01:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to James Mason (neo-Nazi), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''I reviewed the sources used for the text you are removing, and it appears to be well sourced meeting WP:RSP. If you feel this content should still be removed, feel free to start a conversation on the talk page for the article explaining your reasoning.''  Skipple  ☎  02:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at James Mason (neo-Nazi) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James Mason (neo-Nazi), you may be blocked from editing. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 14:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not censored lol1 VNIO  ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 14:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * PS. It's not defamation if it's fact according to US law. lol1 VNIO  ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 14:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at James Mason (neo-Nazi). WindTempos (talk • contribs) 14:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)