User talk:133.18.173.50

Pseudo b-sides
Do you need that page protected again and your range reblocked to understand the meaning of irrelevant? (CC) Tb hotch ™ 17:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:133.18.173.50. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Binksternet (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * 1. Words like "Pseudo b-sides" and rhetorical question were attacking/agressive in the very first place.
 * 2. Please explain why these b-sides are "irrelevant" for this album while all her other album pages contain detailed info on b-sides. 133.18.173.50 (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * First of all, because since you started with this edit-war, you haven't attempted to 1) discuss this (until now) and 2) to include a single source that demonstrate that a) the songs were written specifically for the album and not as standalone songs, b) that the songs are B-sides, and c) that your conclusions are not WP:SYNTH or factoids. Second, the term "Pseudo b-sides" is not offensive (I would recommend you to read wikt:pseudo- first) and if you consider the word to be a "rhetorical attacking/agressive question", in no way, and under no circumstance, gives you the right to call me a "Mexicunt". Any admin would have blocked you instead of giving you a warning at that point. Third and lastly, ignoing that WP:Other stuff is not an argument but a fallacy, Flavors of Entanglement at the very least attempts to include a couple of sources. Havoc and Bright Lights does not have a source and anyone can remove unsourced unverifiable information at any point. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 01:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1. Please kindly note that the term 'mexikunt' is not offensive either. If you take the time to look it up in the dictionary, its definition is 'a kunt from mexico', which simply describes the fact that you are one.
 * 2. The pages for Jagged Little Pill, Supposed Former Infatuation Junkie, Under Rug Swept, So-Called Chaos are also sourceless on b-sides.
 * 3. You who is factually a mexikunt have not communicated the need for source until now. Instead, you barbarically said my edit was 'irrelevant', which suggests nothing about it being sourceless. Moreover you were abusing words like 'pseudo' and a rhetorical question to aggressively attack someone.
 * 4. Conclusion can be drawn that you are a hypocrite mexikunt. 133.18.173.50 (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Such Pretty Forks in the Road shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 01:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:133.18.173.50. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —C.Fred (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Such Pretty Forks in the Road) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Longterm abuse from Japan IPs; block evasion by Special:Contributions/36.232.32.0/19 and Special:Contributions/133.18.192.0/18. Binksternet (talk) 14:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)