User talk:134.129.144.217

April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Elena Kagan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Please note the source you are providing does not support the claim you are making. The US Supreme court does not align itself by Party, the way the Legislative and Executive branches do. Certainly this justice leans "liberal", as do most Democrats, but your addition to the Supreme Court justices is misinformation. Also, your arguments are demanding that other editors prove a negative. It is in fact your responsibility to properly source that these justices are appointed by party line, when in fact they are not.'' 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Justices
Thanks for your note. I appreciate that you were trying to make it consistent. The political party really doesn't belong with the justices. I'm afraid I can't keep things even all by myself, this is a collaborative project. The important point is we can't demand that our editors prove our edits are false, the burden is on us to directly support our claims with reliable sources. I most cordially invite you to create an account, but in any case, I wish you happy editing! All the best, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 23:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)