User talk:134.153.73.216

July 2018
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Feng shui. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Feng shui. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * See WP:FRINGE. Wikipedia, following mainstream (i.e. real) science, does not recognize the existence of any sort of "life energy." Ian.thomson (talk) 15:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

So you are ok with inflammatory langue and dismissing a peoples entire religious system. And if this is truly a collaborative effort then my edits should be fine. You're just being difficult. It is not the first time I have removed the term pseudoscience from a page on Wikipedia, they have been accepted before and will be accepted again. There is nothing science related to Feng shui. It is part of a belief system. Are you going to say that belief in Jesus is a pseudoscience cause that is what it sounds like? There is nothing about Science at all. I will just wait for the Ip address to switch and I will do it again.
 * It is possible to be Taoist without believing in Feng shui. Feng shui makes scientifically testable claims that fall short, and operates on assumptions that science rejects.
 * It is possible for a claim to be both religious and pseudoscientific. See Young Earth Creationism.
 * And your threat to IP hop to edit war only shows that you're not here in good faith. As such, I've locked the page.  If you want to be more than a POV pusher, you'll need to discuss matters on the talk page instead of dishonestly edit warring. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, the warnings apply to you as a person, not just to this IP address. Had I not protected the page and waited to see another IP address censor the page again, it would obviously be you and a block would be appropriate for both. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)