User talk:134.184.169.199

May 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Leopold II of Belgium. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nzd  (talk)  10:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --

Hello not sure if this is how it works but I am writing about the edits I did on the Leopold II page. I tried to add this article to prove a link to the extreme left in the vandalism that occurred in ostend in 2004. https://www.demorgen.be/nieuws/hoe-oostendse-activisten-met-een-afgehakte-hand-de-puntjes-op-de-i-zetten-be153d07/Furthermore as an historian ever since a.Hochshild wrote his book it seems it has been taken as a bible which it is not. My edits just follow what is written on the Dutch and French wiki pages. Wikipedia is often abused and I feel my edits made it more representative of what people in Belgium think of leopold which is what the sentence claimed to do. Instruction about the Congo is mandatory for ASO (gymnasium) schools but the classes often point to Anglo-Saxon bias. One article or sentence saying few people remember or talk about it written by a controversial academic is not represenative. I advice checking the school curriculums instead.

Please add my source for extreme left activism.

Two the reference to brutalities is unique to the English language page of this wiki.