User talk:134.226.11.230

Krav Maga
A response to your rewriting of the Krav Maga page. I reverted the page to a previous version. Although, I did like some of the changes you did it is inappropriate to make over a 100 edits of 16K bytes of information over a single day. Wikipedia is a communal site and changes should be done incrementally or discussed previously on the articles talk page so that the community has time to respond to changes. Many of the things you added were unsourced, against community consensus and overly specific for the general instructive nature of the page. Please feel encouraged to add changes in the future, but please be more temperate when altering existing pages. Please refer to "How to edit a page" specifically under "Major Edits"

Hey there! Thanks so much for your considerate response and formal feedback. My sincere apologies if I may have done too much editing within a single day -Alas, I also deeply felt myself that I should've at least constructively confered more with others on wikipedia for their own good-faith perspectives & analysis on said editing. All I can say there is, that for the most part, my own editing was also done in clarifying good-faith and empirically sourced.

Namely, I was specifically clarifying the detailed contents of the current source materials/books/manuals on Krav Maga that are already being supposedly referenced at the bottom of the Krav Maga page. That is, to make the corresponding wikipedia descriptions more accurate and genuinely representative of what is actually described in said references/books etc. (namely "Pure Krav Maga, by Boaz Aviram", and "Krav Maga: How to Defend Yourself Against Armed Assault, by Imi Sde-Or and Eyal Yanilov") as myself and others deeply felt the content on the older Krav Maga page was overly superficial/innacurrate, and thus misrepresentative of the actually detailed contents within several of the Krav Maga books that were supposedly being used as some of the main references.

Although, then again as you did sincerely & considerately acknowledged yourself that you liked some of the edits in that respect, I also now understand fully that my level of editing of the "Sparring" section in particular was in that sense disproportionate and overly specific/detailed/instructive -and on this point especially, I should've indeed taken time to formally follow wikipedia's guidleines and engage in more formal communal discussion with others on wikipedia.

Thanks again so much for your own time in reaching out to me to clarify that with your considerate feedback and corresponding official corrections/revision of the Krav Maga article. Your sincerely & appreciatively, A friendly fellow wikipedian.

August 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively, please note that people of many different faiths read Wikipedia articles. For this reason, there is a guideline about Islamic honorifics in the Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a neutral point of view and consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style by adding honorifics, as you did in Satanic Verses, disturbs uniformity among articles and should only be done with a special reason. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 19:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)