User talk:134.41.133.104

April 2018
Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paleolithic diet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi
So......

Noticed you took out alot of material from Paleolithic Diet, which I put back in, which you took out, which another user put back in.....

So wikipedia is based on WP:CON people working together to try and create an article, so I would like to invite you to the talk page [] for that article to talk about the changes you would like to see to the article. This article has been through a lot of work and discussion.... and any signfiicant change, for it last and not get reverted is probably going to need to be talked about and get consensus on. TantraYum (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history at Paleolithic diet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.