User talk:134.76.252.226

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to John Briley has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Briley was changed by 134.76.252.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954832 on 2013-05-22T09:44:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Briley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 10:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Briley, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 10:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at David, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: David was changed by 134.76.252.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85287 on 2013-05-23T09:43:11+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Heard Island and McDonald Islands— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heard Island and McDonald Islands with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Porridge—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. EN - Jungwon  07:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Porridge. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Porridge was changed by 134.76.252.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955779 on 2022-01-19T07:21:59+00:00

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. 2601:243:802:3747:EC5B:AD6F:5C82:BA50 (talk) 13:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mustafa Nadarević. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Maria Gemmi (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mustafa Nadarević, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 11:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zsohl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mohammed Daoud Khan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Zsohl (Talk) 08:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

I noticed that you have vandalised Mohammed Zahir Shah article. Wikipedia is encyclopedia not place to do vandalism. If you don't stop this i will report you to admins. ArtisticHokoi