User talk:135.180.118.67

Greetings. Your additions are welcome. However, the articles are meant to be in more specific subcategories; "hoax" would be general category (Category:Hoaxes). However, those are good faith edits - Skysmith (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC) ~

I didn't realize I wasn't logged in when I edited. I have to say I disagree with this. I came from the page for Hoax itself, and, being surprised to find no mention in the general article of Piltdown Man, one of the most famous and emblematic hoaxes of all time, I looked for paths to it from that article. Finding the Category: Hoaxes, I looked at that category, and found other specific hoaxes listed, but really a parlous few. The way I, at least, navigate and use Wikipedia, I am far more interested in clicking a link to find a list of famous hoaxes of the past, and then amuse myself touring about there. And since I didn't notice such a list, I clicked on the Category: Hoaxes in hopes of finding such a list. I was interested in any and all that were worthy of wiki pages, and see no particular reason that one should not be listed in the supercategory as well as subcategories, simply so as to be discoverable via one big list. It is a matter of taste, but also I think everyone is better served by more paths to a given piece of information rather than fewer, especially since tastes and ways of reading and learning do differ. --Hammerquill (talk) 04:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)